Be sure to send the moon to come meet me

If I come again
  • ask me anything
  • submit a post
  • rss
  • archive
  • glirsty:

    image
    image
    image
    image
    image

    (via lemonbellflower)

    • 1 year ago
    • 84578 notes
  • tuulikki:

    notemily:

    rynnay:

    floralflowerpower:

    random-shit-writing:

    floralflowerpower:

    cowardlycopycat:

    floralflowerpower:

    abd-illustrates:

    October is ADHD awareness month! 🎉

    The memory issues ADHD causes are some of the scarier and more frustrating parts of living with it - so here’s a set of reaction doodles that all my fellow ADHD peeps are welcome to use whenever anybody decides to comment on your forgetfulness ^ 

    image

    ADHD nukes your working memory.


    If it isn’t part of a hyperfixation its hard to store the details. 😅💕

    It gets especially bad for routine things, because you can’t tell if your memory of doing the thing was from today or yesterday or last week, and that can lead to some dangerous situations such as, say, skipping/overdosing on medication. I have to write down the date when I take my meds in the morning because the first time my memory messed up my medication I was terrified, I had to go with risking skipping because risking overdosing can get real bad real fast

    OMG the medication thing I do that all the time.


    I actually risk overdosing because I can’t drive behind the wheel without my medication.


    My zone outs are more akin to black outs.


    Like I’ll completely zone out and not only not remember what I did but there will be a complete time skip between when I first zoned out and when I came back to reality.


    And sometimes I’ll do weird shit on auto pilot during these.


    Like I once stuck a bag of lettuce in my bed, had no memory of it.


    Went to sleep and my foot touched something wet and I flipped the fuck out till I realized it was lettuce.


    I dont experience that when I take my ADHD meds.


    The memory thing really messes with you.

    HOLY SHIT THAT’S WHAT IT’S CALLED MY WORKING MEMORY IS SHIT I JUST THOUGHT I WAS STUPID IM CRYING 😭😭

    Okay this is my second attempt writeing this because I accidentally reblogged it to the ectoberhaunt blog and had to delete it.

    But no you are not stupid.

    Your brain is wired diffrent.

    ADHD is a disorder of the frontal lobe.

    image

    It affects all of these listed areas.

    It’s not just “not being able to focus or being too hyper”.

    It’s also a dopamine deficiency.

    You can’t make tonic dopmine.

    image

    In laymen’s terms.

    You can only get dopmine in short spurts by doing certain things.

    This is why so many people ADHD struggle with Addictive personalities and turn to drugs or alcohol to self-medicate.

    Which is bad.

    This is what dopmine does.

    image
    image
    image

    Source.

    And being fucking understimated is horrid.

    You ever feel so board and so empty and helpless that you’d rather die?

    That’s a classic symptom.

    That’s why people with ADHD are 5 times more likely to kill themselves.

    image

    Source.

    THIS is why ADHD awareness month is important.

    It broke my heart that so many people with ADHD reblogged my posts not even realizing we have a month.

    You deserve to understand you have a disorder that drastically impacts your life.

    You deserve access to medication, and good doctors, and good resources, and managment skills.

    You deserve to understand that you have probably been horribly abused or gas lit by the people in your life that dont understand your struggle because they never stopped to try too.

    You deserve to understand that you are not stupid.

    You were never stupid.

    lest we forget the mysterious concept of Delayed Gratification and how that’s Not A Thing for ADHD 

    Delayed Gratification is not stimulating now therefor we will be hard pressed to work toward it. Exercise for healthier bodies? too long, don’t care. Work now, paid when you’re done? too long, don’t care. Work first, play later? No, play now, work & regret later. Do x for y minutes and then you do z as a reward? Too long, don’t care, also I can just do z now? who’s gonna stop me, me? 

    Honestly it was a revelation when I found out that ADHD brains just DON’T GIVE THE SAME REWARDS for doing things. Like you mean I’m not just lazy and being like this to make people’s lives harder? My brain actually works differently? It’s depressing to know that I will basically always have a brain that is jonesing for a dopamine fix, but it’s also incredibly validating.

    I wish we could call it by a name that’s more accurate to what it’s like to have the disorder, rather than being named after two of the things that annoy our parents and teachers about it, but maybe someday.

    I still remember hearing that people can actually feel a sense of accomplishment when they finish things. Like, it’s a feeling they get. They have an ability to feel something other than (at best) relief. Can you imagine what that would feel like? Making lists and crossing off the things you’ve done and that somehow creating a brain experience reward? Not always, I understand, but some of these mfers genuinely sometimes get dopamine from completing Tasks. Wtf can you imagine if doing stuff had some kind of positive feeling associated with it sometimes!??

    (via killer-squirtle)

    • 1 year ago
    • 59751 notes
  • bemusedlybespectacled:
“ hazeldomain:
“ oganizediguana:
“ lauraantoniou:
“ lastxleviathan:
“ robotmango:
“ tsunderepup:
“ randomslasher:
“ pastel-selkie:
“ lesbianshepard:
“stupid leftists and their belief in *checks notes* the intrinsic value of...

    bemusedlybespectacled:

    hazeldomain:

    oganizediguana:

    lauraantoniou:

    lastxleviathan:

    robotmango:

    tsunderepup:

    randomslasher:

    pastel-selkie:

    lesbianshepard:

    stupid leftists and their belief in *checks notes* the intrinsic value of human life

    Reblog if you would burn down the statue of liberty to save a life

    Here’s the thing, though. If you asked a conservative “Would you let the statue of liberty burn to save one life?” they’d probably scoff and say no, it’s a national landmark, a treasure, a piece of too much historical importance to let it be destroyed for the sake of one measly life. 

    But if you asked, “Would you let the statue of liberty burn in order to save your child? your spouse? someone you loved a great deal?” the tune abruptly changes. At the very least, there’s a hesitation. Even if they deny it, I’m willing to bet that gun to their head, the answer would be “yes.”  

    The basic problem here is that people have a hard time seeing outside their own sphere of influence, and empathizing beyond the few people who are right in front of them. You’ve got your immediate family, whom you love; your friends, your acquaintances, maybe to a certain degree the people who share a status with you (your religion, your race, etc.)–but beyond that? People aren’t real. They’re theoretical. 

    But a national monument? That’s real. It stands for something. The value of a non-realized anonymous life that exists completely outside your sphere of influence is clearly worth less than something that represents freedom and prosperity to a whole nation, right?

    People who think like this lack the compassion to realize that everyone is in someone’s immediate sphere of influence–that everyone is someone’s lover, or brother, or parent. Everyone means the world to someone. And it’s the absolute height of selfishness to assume that their lives don’t have value just because they don’t mean the world to you. 

    P.S. I would let the statue of liberty burn to save a pigeon. 

    screencap of a news article by the huffington post that reads "i don't know how to explain to you that you should care about other people"

    also, there is an extreme difference between what things or principles *i* personally am willing to die for, and what i would hazard others to die for. and this is a distinction i don’t think the conservative hard-right likes to face.

    an example: so, as the nazis began war against france, the staff of the louvre began crating up and shipping out the artworks. it was vital to them (for many reasons) that the nazis not get their hands on the collections, and hitler’s desire for them was known, so they dispersed the objects to the four winds; one of the curators personally traveled with la gioconda, mona lisa herself, in an unmarked crate, moving at least five times from location to location to avoid detection.

    they even removed and hid the nike of samothrace, “winged victory,” which is both delicate, having been pieced back together from fragments, and incredibly heavy, weighing over three metric tons.

    image

    the curators who hid these artworks risked death to ensure that they wouldn’t fall into nazi hands. and yes, they are just paintings, just statues. but when i think about the idea of hitler capturing and standing smugly beside the nike of samothrace, a statue widely beloved as a symbol of liberty, i completely understand why someone would risk their life to prevent that. if my life was all that stood between a fascist dictator and a masterpiece that inspired millions, i would be willing to risk it. my belief in the power and necessity of art would demand i do so.

    if, however, a nazi held a gun to some kid’s head (any kid!) and asked me which crate the mona lisa was in, they could have it in a heartbeat. no problem! i wouldn’t even have to think about it. being willing to risk my own life on principle doesn’t mean i’m willing to see others endangered for those same principles.

    and that is exactly where the conservative hard-right falls right the fuck down. they are, typically, entirely willing to watch others suffer for their own principles. they are perfectly okay with seeing children in cages because of their supposed belief in law and order. they are perfectly willing to let women die from pregnancy complications because of their anti-abortion beliefs. they are alright with poverty and disease on general principle because they hold the free-market sacrosanct. and i guess from their own example they would save the statue of liberty and let human beings burn instead.

    but speaking as a leftist (i’m more comfortable with socialist tbh), my principles are not abstract things that i hold aside from life, apart or above my place as a human being in a society. my beliefs arise from being a person amidst people. i don’t love art for art’s sake alone, actually! i don’t love objects because they are objects: i love them because they are artifacts of our humanity, because they communicate and connect us, because they embody love and curiosity and fear and feeling. i love art because i love people. i want universal health care because i want to see people universally cared for. i want universal basic income because people’s safety and dignity should not be determined by their economic productivity to an employer. i am anti-war and pro-choice for the same reason: i value people’s lives but also their autonomy and right to self-determination. my beliefs are not abstractions. i could never value a type of economic system that i saw hurting people, no matter how much “growth” it produced. i could never love “law and order” more than i love a child, any child, i saw trapped in a cage.

    would i be willing to risk death, trying to save the statue of liberty? probably, yes. but there is no culture without people, and therefore i also believe there are no cultural treasures worth more than other people’s lives. and as far as i’m concerned the same goes for laws, or markets, or borders.

    Well said!

    This is an excellent ethical discussion.

    The first time I came across this post, randomslasher’s addition was life changing for me. I suddenly understood where the right was coming from, and I had never been angrier.

    This is also why so many people on the right fail to see the hypocrisy of trying to make abortion illegal when they themselves have had abortions. They can tally up their own life circumstances and conclude that it would be difficult or impossible to continue a pregnancy, but they’re completely mystified by the idea that women they don’t know are also human beings with complicated lives and limited spoon allocation.

    This is also why they think “get a job” is useful advice. In their heads they honestly do not understand why the NPCs who make up the majority of the human race can’t just flip a switch from “no job” to “job.” When they say “get a job” they’re filing a glitch report with God and they honestly think that’s all it takes.

    This is also why they tend to view demographics as individuals. They think that every single Muslim is just a different avatar for the same bit of programming.

    Borrowed observation from @innuendostudios​ here, but: there’s also a fundamental difference in how progressives view social problems versus how conservatives view them. That is, progressives view them as problems to be solved, whereas conservatives do not believe you can solve anything.

    Conservatives view social issues as universal constants that fundamentally are unable to be changed, like the weather. You can try to alter your own behavior to protect yourself (you can carry an umbrella), and you can commiserate about how bad the weather is, but you can’t stop it from raining. This is why conservatives blame victims of rape for dressing immodestly or for drinking or for going out at night: to them, those things are like going out without an umbrella when you know it’s going to rain. 

    “But then why do conservatives try to stop things they dislike by making them illegal, like drug use or immigration or abortion?” And the answer is: they’re not. They know perfectly well that those things will continue. No amount of studies showing that their methods are ineffective will matter to them because effectiveness is not the point. The point is to punish people for doing bad things, because punishing people is how you show your disapproval of their actions; if you don’t punish them, then you’re condoning their behavior. 

    This is why they will never support rehabilitative prisons, even though they reduce crime. This is why they will never support free birth control for everyone, even though that would reduce abortions. This is why they will never support just giving homeless people houses, even though it’s proven to be cheaper and more effective at stopping homelessness than halfway houses and shelters. It’s not about stopping evil, because you can’t; it’s about saying definitively what is Bad and what is Good, and we as a society do that by punishing the people we’ve decided are bad. 

    This is why the conservative response to “holy fuck, they’re putting children in cages!” is typically something along the lines of “it’s their parents’ fault for trying to come here illegally; if they didn’t want to have their kids taken away, they shouldn’t have committed a crime.” It doesn’t matter that entering the US unlawfully is a misdemeanor and child kidnapping isn’t typically a criminal sentence. It does not matter that this has absolutely zero effect on people unlawfully entering the US. The point is that conservatives have decided that entering unlawfully is Bad, anything that is not punishing undocumented immigrants – due process of asylum and removal defense claims, for example – is supporting Badness, and kidnapping children is an appropriate punishment for being Bad.

    (via underatedmarine)

    • 2 years ago
    • 306978 notes
  • beetledrink:

    bogleech:

    beetledrink:

    i’m being neurotypical for april fools day

    How do you do, fellow functioning brain owner!! I sure do enjoy looking people directly in the face while I speak to them, don’t you??? After we comfortably tend to all pressing responsibilities for the day, what say we participate in a loud, crowded social gathering?? Maybe later when we all go home we can lie down in our clean and well made beds long before four in the morning and enjoy a nice, refreshing eight hours of uninterrupted sleep! I hope tomorrow will be both very warm and brightly lit!!!

    i understood what you said the first time you said it because i paid attention and because my audio processing brain meat works super normally, and i’m agreeing with you! i would also like you to know that my brain produces the normal amounts of all my chemicals, nothing more and nothing less

    (via the-adhd-society)

    • 3 years ago
    • 32685 notes
  • bunnykitty13:

    bunnykitty13:

    bunnykitty13:

    also if ur one of those ppl that are like “the black and brown stripes on pride flags are uglyyy umu make it more aesthetically pleasing!!!” please stop talking i dont like you

    actually no fuck you if you say this, black and brown lgbt people did NOT build this community only for you to turn and spit in their faces in such a nonchalant way. who cares about your uwu pastel aesthetic people are DYING and it pisses you off that two or three more stripes are included in a flag??? good. die mad

    image

    (via icrangirl)

    • 3 years ago
    • 65174 notes
  • Reblog if you’re black tumblr.

    redheadsims-cc:

    joygucci-deactivated20160123:

    You don’t have to be black, it just means you support us, you stand by us and your for us.

    image

    Originally posted by pabstbloribbon

    (via underatedmarine)

    • 3 years ago
    • 834950 notes
  • alwaysbewoke:

    image

    A new study, however, suggests that the main threat to our democracy may not be the hardening of political ideology, but rather the hardening of one particular political ideology. Political scientists Steven V. Miller of Clemson and Nicholas T. Davis of Texas A&M have released a working paper titled “White Outgroup Intolerance and Declining Support for American Democracy.” Their study finds a correlation between white American’s intolerance, and support for authoritarian rule. In other words, when intolerant white people fear democracy may benefit marginalized people, they abandon their commitment to democracy.

    Miller and Davis used information from the World Values Survey, a research project organized by a worldwide network of social scientists which polls individuals in numerous countries on a wide range of beliefs and values. Based on surveys from the United States, the authors found that white people who did not want to have immigrants or people of different races living next door to them were more likely to be supportive of authoritarianism. For instance, people who said they did not want to live next door to immigrants or to people of another race were more supportive of the idea of military rule, or of a strongman-type leader who could ignore legislatures and election results.

    The World Values Survey data used is from the period 1995 to 2011 — well before Donald Trump’s 2016 run for president. It suggests, though, that Trump’s bigotry and his authoritarianism are not separate problems, but are intertwined. When Trump calls Mexicans “rapists,” and when he praises authoritarian leaders, he is appealing to the same voters.

    Miller and Davis’ paper quotes alt right, neo-fascist leader Richard Spencer, who in a 2013 speech declared: “We need an ethno-state so that our people can ‘come home again’… We must give up the false dreams of equality and democracy.” Ethnic cleansing is impossible as long as marginalized people have enough votes to stop it. But this roadblock disappears if you get rid of democracy. Spencer understands that white rule in the current era essentially requires totalitarianism. That’s the logic of fascism.

    Trump’s rise is often presented as a major break with the past, and as a repudiation of American values and democratic commitments. But in an email, Miller pointed out that white intolerance has long served as an excuse for, and a spark for, authoritarian measures.

    “People are fond of the Framers’ grand vision of liberty and equality for all,” Miller says, “but the beauty of the Federalist papers can’t paper over the real measures of exclusion that were baked into their understanding of a limited franchise.”

    Black people, Asians, Native Americans and women were prevented from voting for significant stretches of American history. America’s tradition of democracy (for some) exists alongside a tradition of authoritarianism (for some). The survey data doesn’t show people rejecting American traditions, then, Miller says, so much as it shows “a preference for the sort of white-ethnocentrism that imbued much of the functional form of democracy for the better part of two centuries.”

    (via)

    once again i feel like this is news to white people. black people and other poc have always known that white people are only on board with democracy if it benefits them and does NOT help us in any way that they see as a threat to their power. this is why i always laugh when ppl talk about american freedom and democracy. it’s perverted as fuck and shouldn’t be an example for anybody.  

    like mlk said

    image

    (via liberalsarecool)

    • 3 years ago
    • 1152 notes
  • osunism:

    tenaflyviper:

    rinlockhart:

    kingdomheartsddd:

    painisthecleanser:

    sasukehateblog:

    softurl:

    adataraxia:

    tinydickhaver:

    elphabaoftheopera:

    unicornfan:

    akiraita:

    undrjoyed:

    analienorsutin:

    gunpowderandspark:

    turtle-powered:

    gunpowderandspark:

    thisisdefinitelyacreativename:

    gunpowderandspark:

    gayantivan:

    gunpowderandspark:

    We need to have a nomination for “Stupidest thing Tumblr.com has ever believed” and just move into an official Top 10 List.

    For my nominations, I’m putting up:

    • If you eat a chocolate bar a very specific way, you will break physics and get infinite chocolate.

    or

    • It is impossible that you spelled “Berenstain Bears” wrong and is, instead, more likely that the universe fractured into separate, overlapping realities in the last 20 years.

    I can’t decide which is more beautiful. It’s why we need a vote.

    this is a picture of the human brain at the moment of death. tragic and beautiful

    Fuck. That is a damn good nomination.

    if you close your eyes when the train hits your brain will assume you are dead. Some find this comforting.

    We’re getting into the good ones now. This is some classic Tumblr.

    Two old favourites:

    “Bitch, That’s the Tubby Custard Machine” (http://imgur.com/gallery/IObQF)

    and the horse dildo that was passed off as someone’s arm. (http://abakkus.tumblr.com/post/48958415162)

    This is rapidly becoming a master post of ignorances and I could not possibly be happier.

    Rare blue watermelon

    That disease where you get purple eyes, no period, and no body hair

    How have we gone this far without anyone mentioning the bird in the chocolate fountain

    soap makes water molecules smaller

    I nominate the “we are killing the earth” picture of the earth in comparison from 1978 to 2012

    image

    the dog with the slice of ham on its face that everyone thought was a gigantic burn scar

    “Tequila is the only alcohol thats not a depressant so you can drink as much of it as you like”

    image

    that post with the picture of the joker without makeup and people thinking it was a real person and defending him

    that photo of voldemort being passed off as an aborted fetus

    The two way mirror

    “listen here, cumslut.”

    I can’t believe you guys forgot someone trying to pass off a picture of the inside of a fig as a microscopic view of the inside of a vagina.

    I can’t believe I was on Tumblr for every single one of these posts.

    (via lemonbellflower)

    • 3 years ago
    • 473500 notes
  • antifamutantdown:

    mitski-miyawakis:

    chaifootsteps:

    bluehairedspidey:

    wow i cant believe adhd doof is canon

    adhdoof

    #this is literally how I talk

    image
    image

    It’s the “back on topic, baby” that killed me, that’s me.

    (via icrangirl)

    • 3 years ago
    • 148092 notes
  • kradeiz:

    arrghigiveup:

    gale-of-the-nomads:

    notsomerryerry:

    chabbit:

    bulbasaur-propaganda:

    Growing up with your starters

    Artist:  esasi8794 / Twitter

    The captions are also really cute, although they mostly describe what’s in each photo:

    Bulbasaur: Somehow, nomming on my clothes… has become a weird habit of theirs.

    Venusaur: That hasn’t changed now that they’ve grown, but they’re very gentle.

    Charmander: It’s my first attempt, but I made a plushie so that he wouldn’t get lonely.

    Charizard: That plushie seems to be his favorite even now.

    Squirtle: Squirtle’s a bit timid and hides behind me at the smallest things.

    Blastoise: Looks like they’re scared of the first Pichu they’ve seen. You’re not really hiding!

    @noelle217

    This is adorable

    They just posted some more!

    image
    image
    image

    [source]

    And some more!

    image
    image
    image

    (via killer-squirtle)

    • 3 years ago
    • 395549 notes
© 2013–2023 Be sure to send the moon to come meet me
Next page
  • Page 1 / 1039